A recent publication in the UK media based on a research of the University of Zaragoza (Spain) started a new discussion on a substance of which too little is known and which might possibly migrate into food. However, it is not clear whether the tested adhesive-film-combination was even intended to be used in contact with food.
The findings of the Spanish group are not surprising. 2,4,7,9-Tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol (TMDD; CAS no. 126-86-3 ) is a common additive in the field of adhesives. We know that a wide range of adhesive formulations, even in the field of food labels, are containing this substance.
In case of the adhesives submitted to us for analysis, we test for the specific migration of various substances – among them also TMDD. If the results turn out to be above 10 ppb we have to declare a product not suitable for food contact. Of course, the restricted surface to food ratio is considered here.
Our evaluation is solely based on nescience since, according to our knowledge, not enough toxicological data is available. Thus, it should be clarified beforehand how “highly toxic” TMDD really is as stated in the publication. In literature, there is also contradicting data to be found: For example, this substance is classified by the US Environmental Protection Agency as having only low to moderate acute toxicity. Up to now we also have no indications of a mutagenic or carcinogenic effect. Adhesive formulations containing TMDD allow us to very easily evaluate beforehand whether a compliance with the Framework Directive (EC) No. 1935/2004 is given. The specific migration, too, can be supervised clearly.
It would be regrettable indeed if another technically useful substance were banned in food packages only due to one negative headline being circulated without sufficient background details. |